<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Apple Changes App Store Links to be SEO Friendly</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.michaelapproved.com/articles/apple-changes-app-store-links-to-be-seo-friendly/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.michaelapproved.com/articles/apple-changes-app-store-links-to-be-seo-friendly/</link>
	<description>Tap my brain, drink it up.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2010 04:04:33 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: MichaelApproved</title>
		<link>http://www.michaelapproved.com/articles/apple-changes-app-store-links-to-be-seo-friendly/comment-page-1/#comment-22</link>
		<dc:creator>MichaelApproved</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 02:40:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelapproved.com/articles/?p=147#comment-22</guid>
		<description>The URL you&#039;re describing is a friendly version meant only for humans. This new URL format is now being used in the iTunes code which I suspect is meant for both humans and spiders.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You&#039;re right about the App Store being on the web already but it&#039;s done in such a limited manner. If I remember right it&#039;s in a tiny frame with only partial app description.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The URL you&#39;re describing is a friendly version meant only for humans. This new URL format is now being used in the iTunes code which I suspect is meant for both humans and spiders.</p>
<p>You&#39;re right about the App Store being on the web already but it&#39;s done in such a limited manner. If I remember right it&#39;s in a tiny frame with only partial app description.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: clatko</title>
		<link>http://www.michaelapproved.com/articles/apple-changes-app-store-links-to-be-seo-friendly/comment-page-1/#comment-21</link>
		<dc:creator>clatko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 02:09:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelapproved.com/articles/?p=147#comment-21</guid>
		<description>But there has always been the SEO friendly shortened urls: &lt;a href=&quot;http://itunes.com/apps/%3Cappnamelowercasenospaces&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://itunes.com/apps/&lt;appnamelowercasenospaces&lt;/a&gt;&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Working example: &lt;a href=&quot;http://itunes.com/apps/echofonprofortwitter&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://itunes.com/apps/echofonprofortwitter&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Also, @Vishal the app store is already on the web. Just not in the format you would expect.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But there has always been the SEO friendly shortened urls: <a href="http://itunes.com/apps/%3Cappnamelowercasenospaces" rel="nofollow">http://itunes.com/apps/&#038;lt;appnamelowercasenospaces</a>&gt;</p>
<p>Working example: <a href="http://itunes.com/apps/echofonprofortwitter" rel="nofollow">http://itunes.com/apps/echofonprofortwitter</a></p>
<p>Also, @Vishal the app store is already on the web. Just not in the format you would expect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vishal</title>
		<link>http://www.michaelapproved.com/articles/apple-changes-app-store-links-to-be-seo-friendly/comment-page-1/#comment-20</link>
		<dc:creator>Vishal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 21:39:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelapproved.com/articles/?p=147#comment-20</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re right.  Direct app store links are visible if you do a Google query like &quot;smule site:itunes.apple.com&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#39;re right.  Direct app store links are visible if you do a Google query like &#8220;smule site:itunes.apple.com&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MichaelApproved</title>
		<link>http://www.michaelapproved.com/articles/apple-changes-app-store-links-to-be-seo-friendly/comment-page-1/#comment-19</link>
		<dc:creator>MichaelApproved</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 21:10:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelapproved.com/articles/?p=147#comment-19</guid>
		<description>Actually, Google seems to be trying to index the app store. It even has direct app store links as top search results for some apps. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think the bigger plan is to eventually bring the app store to the web.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, Google seems to be trying to index the app store. It even has direct app store links as top search results for some apps. </p>
<p>I think the bigger plan is to eventually bring the app store to the web.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vishal</title>
		<link>http://www.michaelapproved.com/articles/apple-changes-app-store-links-to-be-seo-friendly/comment-page-1/#comment-18</link>
		<dc:creator>Vishal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 21:04:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelapproved.com/articles/?p=147#comment-18</guid>
		<description>Why do you think Apple would make App Store links SEO friendly, given that the App Store is not (and can not be) directly indexed by any search engines?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why do you think Apple would make App Store links SEO friendly, given that the App Store is not (and can not be) directly indexed by any search engines?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.279 seconds -->
